Encounters and transformations in Iron Age Europe: the ENTRANS Project
The Iron Age in Europe was a period of tremendous cultural dynamism, during which the values and constructs of urbanised Mediterranean civilisations clashed with alternative webs of identity in ‘barbarian’ temperate Europe. Until recently, archaeologists and ancient historians have tended to view the cultural identities of Iron Age Europeans as essentially monolithic (Romans, Greeks, Celts, Illyrians etc.). Dominant narratives have been concerned with the supposed origins and spread of peoples, such as ‘the Celts’ (e.g. Collis 2003), and their subsequent ‘Hellenisation’ or ‘Romanisation’ through encounters with neighbouring societies. Yet there is little to suggest that collective identity in this period was exclusively or predominantly ethnic, national or even tribal. Instead, we need to examine the impact of cultural encounters at the more local level of the individual, kin-group or lineage, exploring identity as a more dynamic, layered construct.
The ENTRANS Project (Encounters and Transformations in Iron Age Europe), funded by HERA and the European Commission and running from 2013–2016, has been developed in response to these concerns. ENTRANS is a collaboration between the universities of Bradford, Zagreb and Ljubljana and the Institute for the Protection of Cultural Heritage of Slovenia, with affiliate partners including the Archaeological Museum of Zagreb, the National Museum of Slovenia, the City Museum of Ljubljana, the Dolenjska Museum, the Regional Museum of Maribor, the Institute for Archaeology in Zagreb, the Centre for Prehistoric Research in Croatia and the University of Cork. This brief report sets out the agenda of the project.
The East Alpine region, including parts of northern Italy, Slovenia, Croatia and Austria, formed a major locus for cultural encounters throughout much of pre- and proto-history (Figure 1). In particular, the North Balkans (including Slovenia and Croatia) occupy a key gateway east of the Alps, which otherwise formed a formidable barrier to socio-economic interaction. ENTRANS aims to examine the nature and impact of cultural encounters on the construction and negotiation of identities in this area during the Early Iron Age.
Communities in the East Alpine region occupied nodal points on complex routeways, along which flowed trade goods, linguistic forms, migrant groups, cultural values and political and religious ideas. In this highly fluid social world, new social and cultural identities were materialised through a range of media, of which ENTRANS examines three: art, mortuary practice and landscape. These three are linked by a common focus on the body and embodied experience.
Art, landscape and the body
The artistic tradition known as ‘situla art’ comprises elaborate metalwork decorated with complex figural scenes that draw on Etruscan technologies and hybridised iconography (Figure 2). A key focus of situla art is the human body, carefully constructed in relation to posture, clothing, gesture and expression. A programme of digitisation underpinning technological and iconographic analysis as part of ENTRANS is exploring the role of the depicted body in the creation and maintenance of Iron Age identities. Attitudes to the body can equally be addressed through treatments of the dead, which underwent significant change during the Early Iron Age (e.g. Potrebica 2009; Črešnar & Thomas 2012), including new forms of funerary performance, greater monumentality of burial mounds and new bodily treatments (Figure 3). Explorations of funerary practice as part of ENTRANS include excavation and geophysical survey, as well as extensive osteoarchaeological and stable isotope analysis. New, culturally mediated landscapes also appeared, in which religious, funerary, domestic and economic activities were drawn together within circumscribed areas (e.g. Mason 2008), where movement and experience were carefully choreographed (Figure 4). Lidar mapping and geophysical survey as part of ENTRANS have begun to reveal corridors of movement both within settlements (Figure 5) and through the wider landscape (Figure 6), enabling detailed reconstructions of landscape perception and inhabitation (Mlekuž & Črešnar 2014). The key task for ENTRANS will be the integration of these analytical strands to enable new understandings of the changing social worlds of the Early Iron Age in the region.
ENTRANS has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement no. 291827. The project is financially supported by the HERA Joint Research Programme (http://www.heranet.info), which is co-funded by AHRC, AKA, BMBF via PT-DLR, DASTI, ETAG, FCT, FNR, FNRS, FWF, FWO, HAZU, IRC, LMT, MHEST, NWO, NCN, RANNÍS, RCN, VR and The European Community FP7 2007–2013, under the socio-economic sciences and humanities programme.
- COLLIS, J.R. 2003. The Celts: origins, myths, inventions. Stroud: Tempus.
- ČREŠNAR, M. & J.-L. THOMAS. 2012. New data on cremation burials from north-eastern Slovenia, in M. LOCHNER & F. RUPPENSTEIN (ed.) Cremation burials in the region between the Middle Danube and the Aegean, 1300–750 BC: 79–97. Vienna: Mitteilungen der Prähistorischen Kommission der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
- MASON, P. 2008. Places for the living, places for the dead and places in between: hillforts and the semiotics of the Iron Age landscape in central Slovenia, in G. CHILDREN and G. NASH (ed.) Archaeology of semiotics and the social order of things: 97–106 (BAR International Series 1833). Oxford: Archaeopress.
- MLEKUŽ, D. & M. ČREŠNAR. 2014. Landscape and identity politics of the Poštela hillfort, in S. TECCO-HVALA (ed.) Studia praehistorica in honorem Janez Dular: 197–211. Ljubljana: Opera Instutit Archaeologici Sloveniae 30.
- POTREBICA, H. 2009. Kaptol and the Early Iron Age of Central and Western Slavonia, in B. BIŠKUPIĆ (ed.) Slavonia, Baranja and Syrmia: sources of European civilisation: 96–103. Zagreb: Ministry of Culture.
* Author for correspondence.
- Ian Armit
School of Archaeological Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom BD7 1DP
- Hrvoje Potrebica
University of Zagreb, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Department of Archaeology, I., Lucica 3, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
- Matija Črešnar
Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Arts, University of Ljubljana, Aškerčeva 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Philip Mason
Institute for the Protection of Cultural Heritage of Slovenia, Centre for Preventive Archaeology, Poljanska 40, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Lindsey Büster*
School of Archaeological Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom BD7 1DP (Email: email@example.com)